Trial Report · Season 2025/26

Zimbabwe Leaf Tobacco Trials — Mvurwi

A Maguires–ZLT small-scale trial on Mr Chawasarira’s farm in Mvurwi — comparing Fluopyram and Kyno-Humate against Fluopyram alone and Plesiva Star, to assess root development, aphid and nematode pressure, and how the treated rows establish against the control.

A healthy stand of trial tobacco at Mvurwi

Trial at a Glance

Farmer
Mr Chawasarira
Location
Mvurwi
Planted
21 November 2025
Trial Rows
3 treatment rows + control

Trial Overview

The Zimbabwe Leaf Tobacco packs were used throughout this farmer’s fields. The trial set three rows against the standard programme to answer three questions — how the crop’s roots develop, whether nematodes and insects take hold, and how the treated rows compare with the control.

  • Fluopyram + Kyno-Humate — 23 mL Fluopyram + 125 mL Kyno-Humate in 10 L of water; the primary nematicide paired with our root bio-stimulant
  • Fluopyram — 23 mL in 10 L of water; the primary nematicide on its own, understudy
  • Plesiva Star — 0.6 g in 10 L of water, substituting the primary insecticide Imidacloprid

Each row carried 80 plants, with a 30 mL cup of the relevant solution added to every planting hole.

The trial rows laid out with treatment signs against the control

The Season, Step by Step

The rows were followed from planting in November 2025 through four visits to a field day in late February.

  1. 21 November 2025

    Planting day

    The last rain before planting was minimal. Old maize stalks were left in the lands, but insect presence was low. Soil moisture was low, so moisture-enhancing practices were implemented at planting. A 30 mL cup of each row’s solution was added to every planting hole, with 80 plants per row.

    A seedling planted into a watered planting hole
    The team watering in the newly planted seedlings
  2. 12 December 2025

    First visit — the treatments marked out

    There is a visible difference between the control row and the trial rows. All the plants in the trial rows have taken and are looking healthy, while there have been plant deaths in the control area, where the plants appear stressed and less established. Weeds were visible in both. The three treatment rows — Fluopyram, Fluopyram + Kyno-Humate, and Plesiva Star — were marked out with signs.

    The Fluopyram row marked with its sign
    The Fluopyram plus Kyno-Humate row marked with its sign
    The Plesiva Star row marked with its sign
  3. 8 January 2026

    Second visit — the trial area

    All the plants in the trial area are looking healthy and well established, with fewer weeds noticed — an average of 11 leaves and an average length of 55 cm.

    The Fluopyram row well established in early January
    A healthy trial plant in early January
  4. 8 January 2026

    Aphids across the whole field

    The whole trial and control area was infested with aphids at this visit. The control plants have improved but are less established and uniform, with signs of sun scorching.

    The control area, less established, in early January
    Aphids on the underside of a leaf
  5. 27 January 2026

    Third visit — growing strongly

    By late January the crop is growing strongly, holding good colour and vigour through the trial rows.

    Inspecting a leaf on a thriving trial plant
    A full, healthy trial plant in late January
  6. 19 February 2026

    Fourth visit — a full, even crop

    By mid February the trial has grown out into a full, even crop across the treated rows, well ahead towards the end of the season.

    The trial rows in mid February, still marked with their signs
    A full stand of trial tobacco in mid February
  7. Root development

    The reason for the root bio-stimulant

    Lifting a plant shows the strong, fibrous root system the Fluopyram and Kyno-Humate combination is built to encourage — the root development that is the whole point of the trial.

    A trial plant lifted to show its full root ball
  8. 26 February 2026

    Field day

    A field day was held on the farm to walk growers through the trial rows and show the difference the treatments had made across the season.

    The field day set up beside the trial with Maguires banners
    Growers walking the trial rows on the field day
    The group gathered in the trial on the field day

Aphid Pressure

The whole field — trial and control alike — came under aphid pressure in early January. Counting affected plant stations across the three treatment rows showed how evenly the aphids had spread, with Plesiva Star carrying the fewest.

Aphid pressure at the second visit (8 January 2026)
Treatment rowPlant stations affectedOut of
Fluopyram3980
Fluopyram + Kyno-Humate3680
Plesiva Star3380

Conclusion

The chemical combinations — especially the treatments involving Fluopyram and Kyno-Humate — showed clear early benefits:

  • Improved early crop growth
  • Stronger plant establishment
  • Healthy foliage
  • Whole trial and control infested with aphids in early January

These results indicate positive early trial performance and justify continued monitoring. Samples have been taken and submitted to Kutsaga for root and soil nematode analysis.

Key Finding

The trial rows established stronger and more evenly than the control from the first visit — and even through a field-wide aphid flush, the Fluopyram and Kyno-Humate crop held its vigour and its roots.